The #1 New York Times bestseller that charts America’s dangerous drift into a drifted from linking the sacrifices of our armed forces around the world to the. DRIFT The Unmooring of American Military Power By Rachel Maddow; WARTIME An Idea, Its history, Its Consequences By Mary L. Dudziak. Rachel Maddow argues that the decision to take America to war has become too easy. The Unmooring of American Military Power.

Author: Kektilar Nikobei
Country: Ukraine
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Environment
Published (Last): 20 January 2004
Pages: 163
PDF File Size: 11.47 Mb
ePub File Size: 15.15 Mb
ISBN: 291-6-76455-991-8
Downloads: 64180
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Moogukora

For TV, that is.

Drift by Rachel Maddow | : Books

I began to listen to her faithfully as miliary as she was given a 5 A. I’m also a policy hawk — I think an extremely strong American military, used properly, is the best bet the world has to see the influence of democracy, small d, increase over the next years. I believe that every member of congress and the president and his advisers all need to read this book and pay attention.

She does conclude with a list of things that can be done – again mostly bi-partisan, no-nonsense propositions. I also said I found it often off-topic because, as another reviewer said well: Let’s say it is worse now. All freedoms burn so nicely on the pyre of national security, or claims of national security anyway. She explains how the US Constitution had intended to set up some safeguards against going to war too easily, namely the requirement of Congress approval, in the absence of which a President could only use military force for a maximum period of 60 days.

Maddow has a particular political bent; I’m not about to pretend she doesn’t. Rachel Maddow talked about miliitary embrace in the United States of perpetual war as a way of life and looked at how views of war – and the business of war – have changed since Vietnam.

I did something bad. That sounds like heaven on earth for some politicos, some military leaders and a whole lot of contractors who have been growing Jabba-the-Hutt chunky on public dollars. People like Thomas Jefferson were concerned that their new republic could get caught up in an unending spiral of war, with Americans dying at the whim of king-like presidents who used conflict as a political ploy to shore up their support.


Yeah, I’ll try and write a proper review at some point but I just freaking love Rachel Maddow. I think that is a good point, and seeking a better balance in this highest-level relationship is a worthy cause. The point is, it is not as simple as Maddow makes it: Lists with This Book.

Maddow lower have spent more time looking at drones, and other modern issues that may only get worse in the future. You could really hear Maddow’s wonky, but hilarious, voice on every page.

Since, all of the following presidents have used their executive power to make war, against the founding fathers express instructions that no one person should be able to take the country into war. One way of getting cash was by selling weapons, which he did to any country no matter how sketchy that would pay, like Saudi Arabia and Iran. On the other hand, she paints other conservatives such as Colin Powell and George H. Drift is, basically, a book about how come it’s so druft for the US to go to war these days, which I have to admit is something that I have occasionally wondered.

Drift: The Unmooring of American Military Power

Apr 05, Bill Kerwin rated it really liked it. A few quick thoughts–first, she does address the fact dgift Congress has never effectively asserted itself to stop a president with a “bead on war.

Congress was given the authority to declare war, forcing the executive branch of government to seek congressional approval before diving into conflicts. She actually proposes at the end of Drift solutions to the problem. Next, Maddow discusses the volunteer army and unmooing it is a necessary component in the evolution of our current situation. Ideally, I’d put it at 3. BushJimmy CarterGeorge H. She points out that this has been the result of policies mklitary both parties, that presidents on both sides of the aisle have been willing to embrace this drift away from the Founding Fathers’ original intent and that Congress, again on both sides of the aisle, have allowed this to happen with almost no objection.

I have a vague memory of it happening but the details were fuzzy. Apr 11, Lynn rated it it was amazing. The book is also structured in a very unorganized way.

TOP Related Posts  INFOLINUX 2011 PDF

Then his undeclared intervention in the Russian Civil War. Highlights for me included the explanation of the entire Iran-Contra affair I was, um, too young to be aware of it anerican the time, so I have always wondered what was going on and the best or at least unmolring horrifying chapter, a list of all the inadvertent and horrifying things that have happened with the US nuclear missile stockpile, including accidentally flying live nukes across the country in Rachel Maddow, the most charming, and surely one of the brightest political commentators amdrican the scene, has written a thoughtful analysis of how we got from what, in law poder not always in practice, was a disinclination towards war, to the current state of affairs in which presidents can Suppose they gave a war and no one protested?

President Eisenhower had seen WWII with his eyes and he was committed to do anything he could to avoid that level of horror and suffering. The US defence budget is so stupendously massive, employs so vast a number of people, is linked to so numerous a list of private companies that its complexity is almost impossible to grasp, and it is near impregnable to oversight or trimming.

I have a few gripes about Drift. Here is another proposal: People who hate her may be surprised by how often in Drift she espouses some of the most conservative values: Her brief review of Operation Urgent Fury Poder of Grenada is an interesting collection of stories and an inside look at Reagan’s rationale, but it seemed more a record of a less-than-perfectly-executed military operation than a critique on any particular aspect of military leadership, particularly in the policy arena.

Looking for More Great Reads? She also leaves thr very important facts that a book like this should absolutely have included or at least mentioned: